ISSN: 2455-8400
International Journal of Aquaculture and Fishery Sciences
Research Article       Open Access      Peer-Reviewed

Formulation of Fish Feeds using Indigenous Plant Raw Materials and their Impacts on Growth and Maturity of Small Indigenous Fish Species (SIS) Mystus cavasius (Hamilton, 1822)

Amrita Shaha1, Anik Talukdar2* and Md Shoebul Islam3

1Department of Aquaculture, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh, Bangladesh
2Bangladesh Fisheries Research Institute, Freshwater Sub-station, Jashore, Bangladesh
3Bangladesh Fisheries Research Institute, Shrimp Research Station, Bagerhat, Khulna, Bangladesh

*Corresponding author: Anik Talukdar, Bangladesh Fisheries Research Institute, Freshwater Sub-station, Jashore, Bangladesh, E-mail: [email protected]
Received: 14 June, 2025 | Accepted: 27 June, 2025 | Published: 28 June, 2025
Keywords: Nutrient; Indigenous plants; Growth rate; Reproduction; Protein level; Feed formulation; Native fish

Cite this as

Shaha A, Talukdar A, Islam MS. Formulation of Fish Feeds using Indigenous Plant Raw Materials and their Impacts on Growth and Maturity of Small Indigenous Fish Species (SIS) Mystus cavasius (Hamilton, 1822). Int J Aquac Fish Sci. 2025;11(2):024-031. Available from: 10.17352/2455-8400.000100

Copyright License

© 2025 Shaha A, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

A feeding trial lasting 120 days was conducted in earthen ponds to evaluate the effects of different dietary protein levels on the growth performance of Mystus cavasius (Hamilton, 1822) broodstock reared in hapas. Five dietary treatments were tested: four iso-caloric experimental feeds containing 30%, 35%, 40%, and 45% crude protein, and one commercial feed containing 33% protein as a reference. All diets were provided at 5% of total body weight, twice daily at 07:30 and 17:30 h. Each treatment was replicated three times. Growth performance was evaluated based on Average Weight Gain (AWG), body Weight Gain (BWG), Percentage Body Weight Gain (PBWG), Specific Growth Rate (SGR), and Average Daily Weight Gain (ADWG) in both male and female fish. Water quality parameters were monitored throughout the trial. Fish fed the 40% protein diet (MF3) exhibited the highest growth, with AWG of 22.80 ± 2.05 g (male) and 42.2 ± 1.05 g (female), significantly higher (p < 0.05) than other treatments. The 35% protein diet (MF2) followed in performance, with the commercial feed showing comparable results. The Gonadosomatic Index (GSI) values of both male and female were higher in MF3 (40% protein) compared to the other four feeds. Furthermore, Statistical analysis confirmed that the 40% protein diet significantly enhanced all growth metrics. Results suggest that 40% dietary protein is optimal for improving the growth of M. cavasius under hapa-based pond culture conditions.

Introduction

The global population is projected to reach 9 billion by 2050, leading to a substantial increase in the demand for food, particularly animal-based protein sources [1]. Meeting this demand presents a critical challenge for the global food production sector, which must ensure the provision of safe, affordable, and sustainable food. To address this issue, sustainable food production systems must be developed that rely on alternative feed ingredients with low human consumption value and reduced requirements for land, water, and energy.

In response to increasing demand for food fish, Bangladesh’s aquaculture industry is rapidly shifting toward more intensive farming practices [2]. The sector has experienced considerable expansion, both in production volume and farming intensity, transitioning from traditional to semi-intensive and intensive systems. This intensification has greatly increased the demand for fish feed, contributing significantly to operational costs [2]. Feed alone accounts for approximately 56.45–58.49% of total production expenses in aquaculture [3], with costs in certain cases rising to 60% - 70% [4-7]. The high cost is largely driven by the demand for dietary protein, which is the most expensive component of manufactured fish feed [8–10]. Fishmeal (FM), commonly used as a primary protein source in aquafeeds, contributes substantially to feed cost and is subject to supply fluctuations [11]. Despite its cost, FM remains essential for providing balanced nutrients that support fish growth and health [9,10,12]. Consequently, replacing FM with more affordable alternative protein sources that offer comparable amino acid profiles has become a key objective in aquaculture nutrition research [13-15]. Among these alternatives, Plant Protein Ingredients (PPI) offer promising potential as cost-effective, sustainable feed components [16].

In parallel, increasing anthropogenic pressures and ecological changes in aquatic ecosystems have resulted in the degradation of natural breeding and feeding habitats for many indigenous fish species. Mystus cavasius (Hamilton, 1822), locally known as Gulsha, is a small indigenous catfish species (SIS) of the Bagridae family that has been categorized as Near Threatened by the IUCN [17] due to overfishing and habitat loss. This species is popular for its palatability and high nutritional value, being rich in proteins, lipids, essential minerals (such as calcium, iron, zinc, magnesium), and vitamins [18].

To protect and restore natural stocks of M. cavasius, the development of captive breeding and culture systems is essential. Nutrition plays a fundamental role in enabling fish to reach their genetic growth and reproductive potential. Optimal growth performance depends not only on feed composition and nutrient balance but also on factors such as feeding behavior, feed intake, ration size, water quality, and temperature [19-21].

In developing countries, feed quality and affordability remain major constraints in aquaculture development [22]. High-quality, nutritionally balanced diets are essential for rapid and efficient fish growth. Therefore, the production of cost-effective fish feeds using locally available plant-based ingredients is crucial for the long-term sustainability of aquaculture in Bangladesh, especially in rural areas. A wide range of agricultural by-products and indigenous raw materials can be utilized to formulate economically viable and nutritionally adequate feeds. The effectiveness of such feeding strategies will directly impact the growth and productivity of M. cavasius [23].

Although several studies have focused on the biology, fecundity, induced spawning, and larval rearing of M. cavasius, limited research exists on feed formulation and nutritional requirements. Notably, Shaha, et al. [24] evaluated vitamin E-supplemented diets for broodstock performance. Building on this, the present study aimed to formulate high-quality, plant-based feeds using indigenous ingredients and evaluate their effects on the growth performance of M. cavasius reared under hapa-based pond culture conditions. It was hypothesized that plant-based formulated diets would not only support comparable growth to conventional feeds but also positively influence the maturation and reproductive potential of M. cavasius, owing to their balanced protein content and locally available nutrients.

Materials and methods

Corn gluten, soybean meal, rice bran, lentil bran, and molasses were collected from the local market in Mymensingh. A vitamin premix was obtained from a sales agent of Bangladesh Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. All feed ingredients were analyzed for their proximate composition—namely, crude protein, lipid, ash, crude fiber, and moisture content—following the standard methods of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists [25], as presented in Table 1.

Calculation of Protein: (%) of Nitrogen = (Titration Reading-Blank Reading) ×Strength of Acidx100/5×100/Weight of the Sample. In this case empirical factor was 6.25 for the fish. Protein (%) = % of Total N2×6.

Chemical analysis of fish feed

Chemical analysis of the row-fish was estimated according to different standard analytical methods developed for proximate analysis:

Determination of the moisture of raw fish paste was conducted following the method [26].

Moisture content ( % ) = Loss of weight Weight of sample taken ×100 MathType@MTEF@5@5@+=feaaguart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLnhiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr4rNCHbGeaGqk0Jf9crFfpeea0xh9v8qiW7rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=xfr=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@7132@

The crude protein of the fish pest powders was determined by the Micro-Kjeldahl method [25]. Briefly, the percentage of nitrogen in fish samples was calculated, and the percentage of protein in the samples was calculated by multiplying the percentage of N by an empirical factor of 6.25.

Percentage of Nitrogen ( % ) = Mili-equivalent of N2(0.014)×N HCl×Titration on value (ml) Weight of sample (gm) ×100 MathType@MTEF@5@5@+=feaaguart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLnhiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr4rNCHbGeaGqk0Jf9crFfpeea0xh9v8qiW7rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=xfr=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@9BA5@

Total lipid content of fish powders was determined by the method as described in the Bligh and Dyer method [27] and calculated using the following equation.

Totallipidcontent ( % ) = Weight of  fat residue Weight of sample taken  ×100 MathType@MTEF@5@5@+=feaaguart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLnhiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr4rNCHbGeaGqk0Jf9crFfpeea0xh9v8qiW7rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=xfr=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@7CCF@

The ash content of the fish samples was determined as the inorganic residues, oxides, sulphates, silicates, and chlorides in the dry muscle. The samples were heated to temperatures of 500 ˚C – 600 ˚C in a muffle furnace for about 3 hours. Afterwards, the percentage of ash content was calculated according to [25,28].

Ash content ( % ) = Weight of  ash Weight of sample taken  ×100 MathType@MTEF@5@5@+=feaaguart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLnhiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr4rNCHbGeaGqk0Jf9crFfpeea0xh9v8qiW7rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=xfr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaqcLbsacaqGbbGaae4CaiaabIgacaqGGaGaae4yaiaab+gacaqGUbGaaeiDaiaabwgacaqGUbGaaeiDaiaabccakmaabmaabaqcLbsacaGGLaaakiaawIcacaGLPaaajugibiaabccacaqG9aGcdaWcaaqaaKqzGeGaae4vaiaabwgacaqGPbGaae4zaiaabIgacaqG0bGaaeiiaiaab+gacaqGMbGaaeiiaiaabccacaqGHbGaae4CaiaabIgaaOqaaKqzGeGaae4vaiaabwgacaqGPbGaae4zaiaabIgacaqG0bGaaeiiaiaab+gacaqGMbGaaeiiaiaabohacaqGHbGaaeyBaiaabchacaqGSbGaaeyzaiaabccacaqG0bGaaeyyaiaabUgacaqGLbGaaeOBaiaabccaaaGaae41aiaabgdacaqGWaGaaeimaaaa@6CA6@

Experimental fish feed at different protein levels

Four different iso-caloric feeds denoted by MF-1, MF-2, MF-3, and MF-4 were prepared by mixing in various combinations of the plant ingredients to give four different protein levels, viz, 30%, 35%, 40% and 45%. Various combinations of the ingredients in such a manner that the total metabolized energy per 100 g of feeds was about 340 Kcal (Table 2) maintained the protein level of 30%, 35% 40% and 45%. The energy content of the feeds was calculated based on 4.0 Kcal/g carbohydrates, 4.0 Kcal/g proteins, and 9.0 Kcal/g lipids [29]. The feeds were made into pellets by adding the starch liquid and drying in an oven at 45 ºC for two days. The company supplies fish feed and also tests a group of fish (CF) in parallel to compare the feed value with locally prepared feed.

Fish feed formulation

The main ingredients used for fish feed production are corn gluten (20-40 percent inclusion), rice bran (20–50 percent inclusion), wheat meal (5–20 percent inclusion), soybean meal (10–30 percent inclusion), lentil meal (5–15 percent inclusion) and molasses (5–15 percent inclusion). Feeds play a key role in the development of fish farming. The major constraints to the emergence of aquaculture in developing countries are feed quality and its cost [22]. Fish require a high-quality and nutritionally balanced diet for adequate growth within the shortest time. Therefore, local production of fish feed using locally available ingredients at low cost is crucial to the development and sustainability of aquaculture in Bangladesh, especially in the rural areas. The ingredient availability, its accessibility, and nutrient composition are of prime importance. Bhilave, et al. [30] indicated that the basic nutrient that cannot be compromised on in the choice of ingredients for feed formulation and production is protein. The present study screened local potential fish feed ingredients available in Bangladesh for their nutritional quality, availability, and cost. The aim is to provide information that can help in incorporating any of these ingredients in the local production of formulated fish feed.

Experimental fish and feeding regime

A total 150 numbers of brood Mystus cavasius (weight: 23.0 ̶ 32.7g) were obtained from Shornolota Agro Fish Hatchery in Fulbaria, Mymensingh, Bangladesh, and were transferred to the place of experiment and acclimated for 2 weeks. Young M. cavasius (gulsha) were fed a supplementary (basal diet) for 2 weeks while acclimating to experimental conditions. A total of one hundred fifty (150) uniform male and female fish were randomly selected and stocked into fifteen (15) net hapa aquarium with a mesh size of 1.5mm and surface area dimension of 0.95×0.50m with a stocking ratio of ten fish (male and female) per hapa. Hapas were suspended and placed in an experimental earthen pond to maintain a water depth of 0.6m inside the hapa. The hapas served as the culture medium for the experiment. Each treatment was replicated thrice. Hapas were tied to a stake with a rope. Sinkers were tied at the bottom edges of each hapas to allow stability in water. Water was pumped into the pond regularly to maintain the desired level of 0.6m in the hapas. Fishes are supplied with feed approximately 5% of their body weight daily, two equal feedings times (8.0 am and 18.0pm) for 90 days. Feed preparation was carried out bi-weekly to prevent long storage.

Growth performance

For evaluating the different growth parameters, such as length gain (cm), weight gain (g), percent (%) weight gain, specific growth rate (SGR% % per day), food conversion ratio (FCR), and protein efficiency ratio (PER) were taken into consideration.

Average Weight Gain (AWG): This was determined by calculating the difference between the initial weight and the final weight of the fish [31].

AWG= W2 – W1, Where W1= initial weight W2= final weight.

Average Daily Weight Gain (ADWG): This was determined by calculating the difference between the initial weight and the final weight divided by time [4].

Average Daily Weight Gain ( ADWG ) = Average final weight(W1)-Average initial weight(W0) time(t)/day  MathType@MTEF@5@5@+=feaaguart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLnhiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr4rNCHbGeaGqk0Jf9crFfpeea0xh9v8qiW7rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=xfr=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@8DA3@

Percentage Weight Gain (PWG): This will be determined from the relationship between the total weight gains of the fish expressed as a percentage of the initial weight.

Percentage Weight Gain ( PWG ) = Average final weight-Average initial weight Average initial weight  ×100     [32] MathType@MTEF@5@5@+=feaaguart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLnhiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr4rNCHbGeaGqk0Jf9crFfpeea0xh9v8qiW7rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=xfr=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@9994@

Specific Growth Rate (SGR): This will be determined from the relationship of the differences in weight of the fish within the experimental period.

Specific Growth Rate ( SGR ) = [Ln w t 1-Lb w t 0] t(time of days)  ×100 MathType@MTEF@5@5@+=feaaguart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLnhiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr4rNCHbGeaGqk0Jf9crFfpeea0xh9v8qiW7rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=xfr=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@7280@

Where Ln natural logarithm, Wt 0= initial weight (g), Wt 1=final weight (g), and t = time of day.

Body weight gain (BWG) = (Wt – W0) ×Nt [34]

Feed conversion ratio FCR = total feed intake (g)/total weight gain (g) [35].

PER = total gain (g)/protein intake (g) [21].

Where Wt and W0 were final and initial fish weights (g), respectively; Nt and N0 were final and initial numbers of fish in each replicate, respectively; L (cm) was final length; and t is the experimental period in days.

Gonadosomatic index

The fish was dissected with scissors, cutting from the anus to the lower jaw, exposing the belly. Fine forceps were utilized to gently extract the stomach and intestine. The ovary was delicately transferred to a Petri dish. With distilled water, the ovary was cleaned and washed [11]. The ovary’s length and weight were measured, and the color of the ovary was examined and documented. Gonadosomatic Index (GSI) values of different feeding trials were collected, and data on different parameters of male and female (n = 30) from fifteen (15) net hapa were recorded and analyzed. The relationship between gonadal maturity and the growth of fish is directly proportional. The GSI therefore rises gradually before the gonads mature into ripening. GSI values were estimated as the ratio of the wet gonad weight to somatic weight expressed in percentage by using the following formula: [36]:

GSI = Weight of the gonad Weight of fish  ×100 MathType@MTEF@5@5@+=feaaguart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLnhiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr4rNCHbGeaGqk0Jf9crFfpeea0xh9v8qiW7rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=xfr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaqcLbsacaqGhbGaae4uaiaabMeacaqGGaGaeyypa0JcdaWcaaqaaKqzGeGaae4vaiaabwgacaqGPbGaae4zaiaabIgacaqG0bGaaeiiaiaab+gacaqGMbGaaeiiaiaabshacaqGObGaaeyzaiaabccacaqGNbGaae4Baiaab6gacaqGHbGaaeizaaGcbaqcLbsacaqGxbGaaeyzaiaabMgacaqGNbGaaeiAaiaabshacaqGGaGaae4BaiaabAgacaqGGaGaaeOzaiaabMgacaqGZbGaaeiAaiaabccaaaGaey41aqRaaGymaiaaicdacaaIWaaaaa@5FC5@

Water quality parameters

Temperature, pH, and Dissolved Oxygen (DO) were monitored during the period of the experiment. The temperature of the water was taken twice a day (8 pm and 4 pm) using a mercury-in-glass thermometer calibrated in degrees Celsius. Dissolved oxygen was measured using the titration method. pH was measured with a digital pH meter (model checker I produced by Hanna Instrument Company). The pH and Dissolved Oxygen were measured weekly.

Statistical analysis

The data obtained from the trial were subjected to one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) (using SPSS 16.0 programme) to test for effects of dietary treatments. When ANOVA identified a significant difference among groups, multiple comparison tests among means were performed using Duncan’s new multiple range test. For each comparison, statistically significant differences were determined by setting the aggregate type I error at 5% (p < 0.05).

Ethics approval

The experiment was conducted based on the guidelines of the Ethical Committee of the Bangladesh Agricultural University Research System (BAURES), Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh, Bangladesh.

Results

Physico-chemical parameters of water

Experimental pond water temperature, pH, dissolved oxygen, and dissolved ammonia during the experimental period in all the hapa were found within the desirable range for the fish rearing. Average Temperature, pH, dissolved oxygen, and dissolved ammonia of water in all hapa ranged from 26.8-29.8 °C, 6.7-7.6, 5.2-6.1 mg/L, and 0.25-0.5 mg/L, respectively.

Effect of feed ingredients on the growth performance of Gangetic Mystus (M. cavasius):

At the end of 90 days, experimental feed and company supply fish feed treatment, the Body Weight Gain (BWG), Percent of Body Weight Gain (PBWG), Daily Growth Rate (DGR) and Specific Growth Rate (SGR), Food Conversion Ratio (FCR) and Protein Efficiency Ratio (PER) of M. cavasius (gulsha) were determined and presented in Tables 3-5.

The Gonado-somatic Index values (GSI) of M. cavasius of different feeds are shown in Figure 1. It is observed from (Figure 1, that the gonado-somatic index values of both male and female were found to be higher in MF3 (40% protein). The average values of gonado-somatic index values for males in CF, MF1, MF2, MF3, and MF4 were 1.58, 1.74, 2.05, 2.35, and 1.93, respectively. The gonado-somatic index values for females were also higher in MF3 compared to the other four feeds.

Discussion

Water quality parameters play a vital role in the successful rearing of fry and fingerlings, directly influencing their growth, survival, and physiological well-being. Among these, water temperature is a critical factor affecting both the physico-chemical and biological properties of the aquatic environment. In the present study, recorded water temperatures ranged from 26.8 °C to 29.8 °C, which is well within the optimal thermal tolerance limits (14 °C–38 °C) reported for tilapia and Mystus gulio [37]. This temperature range supports optimal metabolic activity and growth in freshwater fish species.

The water pH observed during the study ranged from 6.7 to 7.6, aligning with the optimal range (6.5–8.5) recommended for aquaculture [38]. Maintaining pH within this range is essential, as deviations can lead to physiological stress, impaired metabolism, and reduced growth performance in cultured species, including Mystus cavasius.

Dissolved oxygen (DO) concentrations fluctuated slightly between 5.2 and 6.1 mg/L⁻¹, remaining within the recommended range for freshwater fish culture (4.5–8.0 mg/L¹) as reported by Bhatnagar and Sangwan [39]. Adequate oxygen availability is crucial for aerobic respiration and overall fish health. Suboptimal DO levels (below 4 mg/L⁻¹) can result in reduced feeding, physiological stress, electrolyte imbalance, and potentially mortality, which can negatively impact yield and production efficiency.

Un-ionized ammonia (NH₃-N) is another critical parameter, as elevated concentrations are highly toxic, particularly to fry and juvenile fish. In this study, NH₄-N concentrations ranged from 0.25 to 0.5 mg L¹, remaining within the acceptable limit (< 0.5 mg L¹) proposed by Santhosh and Singh [38]. As ammonia toxicity is often associated with gill damage and impaired osmoregulation, the levels recorded in the current study are not expected to contribute to fry mortality.

Total alkalinity, which reflects the buffering capacity of water, also influences water stability and productivity. The measured values in this study were within the suitable range for productive aquaculture systems. According to Alikunhi [40], total alkalinity above 100 mg/L⁻¹ is considered beneficial for fish culture. Previous studies by Paul [41], Kohinoor [42], Garg and Bhatnagar [43], and Kohinoor, et al. [44] similarly reported alkalinity values conducive to fish growth.

Growth performance of M. cavasius broodstock fed diets with varying protein levels is summarized in Table 4. Fish fed with Feed-MF3 (40% crude protein) achieved the highest final weight (105.37 ± 8.16 g), followed by Feed-MF2 (35% protein; 86.58 ± 3.26 g), Feed-MF1 (30% protein; 78.47 ± 2.43 g), and commercial feed (CF; 33% protein), which yielded comparable results to Feed-MF1. Statistical analysis (ANOVA) revealed a significant difference (p < 0.05) in final weight, with Feed-MF3 supporting superior growth.

Growth indicators such as absolute growth, absolute growth rate, and Specific Growth Rate (SGR) were all higher in Feed-MF3 compared to Feed-MF2 and Feed-MF1. Feed-MF4 (45% protein) produced similar growth to Feed-MF3, indicating that protein levels beyond 40% may not result in significant additional growth benefits. These findings are consistent with previous studies demonstrating a positive correlation between dietary protein level and fish growth, up to an optimal threshold. Similar trends have been reported in Chinook salmon [45], common carp [46], and Clarias batrachus [47,48].

The highest reproductive development in both male and female M. cavasius occurred with the MF3 diet, suggesting that an optimal dietary protein level enhances gonadal maturation, with MF3 outperforming other feed formulations in promoting reproductive performance [49-51].

Overall, the results suggest that a dietary protein level of approximately 40% is optimal for maximizing growth performance in M. cavasius broodstock, without incurring unnecessary feed costs or compromising water quality due to excess nitrogenous waste.

Conclusion

This study demonstrates that formulating fish feeds using indigenous plant-based ingredients can effectively support the growth and maturation of Mystus cavasius under hapa-based pond culture conditions. A dietary protein level of approximately 40% was ideal for optimizing the growth performance of M. cavasius broodstock. Additionally, the GSI index indicated that the gonadal development of M. cavasius was more favorable at a 40% dietary protein level compared to others. The results highlight the potential of locally sourced plant proteins as viable alternatives to fishmeal, offering a cost-effective and nutritionally appropriate option for small-scale aquaculture systems. By improving feed efficiency and promoting reproductive performance, these formulations contribute directly to the sustainable intensification of aquaculture in Bangladesh. This approach not only enhances the production of small indigenous species but also strengthens food security and supports rural livelihoods through reduced dependence on imported feed inputs.

The authors would like to express their special gratitude to the farm manager and farmworker of Sharnalata Agro Fisheries Farm, Mymensingh, Bangladesh, for their collaboration and for providing necessary support in the form of infrastructural facilities made available for undertaking this study.

Authors’ contributions

AS: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Data Collection and curation, Software, Writing – original draft, review & editing; AT: Data curation, Software, Writing – review & editing. MSI: Writing – review & editing.

  1. Rimoldi S, Gini E, Iannini F, Gasco L, Terova G. The Effects of Dietary Insect Meal from Hermetia illucens Prepupae on Autochthonous Gut Microbiota of Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Animals. 2019;9(4):143. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9040143
  2. Islam MS, Das M, Chakroborty K, Lee JM, Islam MR, Rafiquzzaman SM. Aquamimicry improves the growth performance and immunity of black tiger shrimp (Penaeus monodon) in low saline ponds. Aquaculture Reports. 2024;36:102082. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aqrep.2024.102082
  3. Hossain MA, Hossain MA, Haque MA, Mondol MMR, Harun-Ur-Rashid M, Das SK. Determination of suitable stocking density for good aquaculture practice-based carp fattening in ponds under drought-prone areas of Bangladesh. Aquaculture. 2022;547:737485. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2021.737485
  4. Khan MA, Abidi SF. Optimum ration level for better growth, conversion efficiencies and body composition of fingerling Heteropneustes fossilis (Bloch). Aquacult Int. 2010;18:175–88. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10499-008-9234-2
  5. Khan A, Guttormsen A, Roll KH. Production risk of pangas (Pangasius hypophthalmus) fish farming. Aquaculture Economics & Management. 2018;22:192–208. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/13657305.2017.1284941
  6. Prodhan MMH, Khan MA. Management practice adoption and productivity of commercial aquaculture farms in selected areas of Bangladesh. J Bangladesh Agric Univ. 2018;16:111–6. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3329/jbau.v16i1.36491
  7. Hossain MM, Rahman MH, Ali ML, Khan S, Haque MM, Shahjahan M. Development of a low-cost polyculture system utilizing Hygroryza aristata floating grass in the coastal wetlands of Bangladesh. Aquaculture. 2020;527:735430. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2020.735430
  8. Iqbal S, Atique U, Mahboob S, Haider MS, Iqbal HS, Al-Ghanim KA, et al. Effect of supplemental selenium in fish feed boosts growth and gut enzyme activity in juvenile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). Journal of King Saud University - Science. 2020;32:2610–6. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksus.2020.05.001
  9. Bjørndal T, Dey M, Tusvik A. Economic analysis of the contributions of aquaculture to future food security. Aquaculture. 2024;578:740071. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2023.740071
  10. H. S. M, Javid A, Azmat H, Abbas S, Ashraf S, Altaf M. Effect of processed fish waste on growth rate and digestive enzymes activities in Cyprinus carpio. Pak. J. Zool. Suppl. 2018;13:191–8. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/330337460_Effect_of_Processed_Fish_Waste_on_Growth_Rate_and_Digestive_Enzymes_Activities_in_Cyprinus_carpio
  11. Datta SRK, Miah MdI, Islam MdR, Talukdar A, Rahman MdH, Alam MA, et al. Estimation of Fecundity and Gonadosomatic Index (GSI) of Somileptes gongota (Hamilton, 1822) from the River Padma in Rajshahi District, Bangladesh. AJFAR. 2023;24:40–50. Available from: https://doi.org/10.9734/ajfar/2023/v24i5646
  12. Batool SS, Khan N, Atique U, Azmat H, Iqbal KJ, Mughal DH, et al. Impact of azomite supplemented diets on the growth and body composition of catfish (Pangasius hypophthalmus). Pakistan Journal of Zoology. 2018;48(4):1205-8. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksus.2020.05.001
  13. Santigosa E, García-Meilán I, Valentín JM, Navarro I, Pérez-Sánchez J, Gallardo MÁ. Plant oils’ inclusion in high fish meal-substituted diets: effect on digestion and nutrient absorption in gilthead sea bream (Sparus aurata L.): Sea bream digestive response to FM- and FO-replaced diets. Aquaculture Research. 2011;42:962–74. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2109.2010.02679.x
  14. Köprücü K, Sertel E. The effects of less-expensive plant protein sources replaced with soybean meal in the juvenile diet of grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idella): growth, nutrient utilization and body composition. Aquacult Int. 2012;20:399–412. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10499-011-9471-7
  15. Al-Thobaiti A, Al-Ghanim K, Ahmed Z, Suliman EM, Mahboob S. Impact of replacing fish meal by a mixture of different plant protein sources on the growth performance in Nile Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus L.) diets. Braz J Biol. 2017;78:525–34. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1590/1519-6984.172230
  16. Kishawy AT, Assi AFK, Badawi ME, Hassanein ESI. Performance, and Economic Efficiency of Replacing Fish Meal with Rice Protein Concentrate in Oreochromis niloticus Diets. AAVS. 2020;9. Available from: https://doi.org/10.17582/journal.aavs/2021/9.2.246.252
  17. IUCN Bangladesh. Red List of Bangladesh, Freshwater Fishes. International Union for Conservation of Nature, Bangladesh Country Office, Dhaka, Bangladesh 5. 2015. Available from: https://portals.iucn.org/library/sites/library/files/documents/RL-549.3-003-v.5.pdf
  18. Bogard JR, Thilsted SH, Marks GC, Wahab MA, Hossain MAR, Jakobsen J, et al. Nutrient composition of important fish species in Bangladesh and potential contribution to recommended nutrient intakes. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis. 2015;42:120–33. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfca.2015.03.002
  19. Eriegha OJ, Ekokotu PA. Factors affecting feed intake in cultured fish species: A review. Animal Research International. 2017;14. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/318258407_FACTORS_AFFECTING_FEED_INTAKE_IN_CULTURED_FISH_SPECIES_A_REVIEW
  20. Fujimoto RY, Santos RFB, Dias HM, Ramos FM, Silva DJF, Honorato CA. Feeding frequency on the production viability of production and quantitative descriptors of parasitism in angelfish. Cienc. Rural. 2016;46:304–9. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-8478cr20141704
  21. Zuanon J, Salaro AN, Moraes SSS, de Oliveira ALM, Balbino EM. Dietary protein and energy requirements of juvenile freshwater angel fish. R Bras Zootec. 2009;36. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982009000600003
  22. Siddhuraju P, Becker K. Comparative nutritional evaluation of differentially processed mucuna seeds [Mucuna pruriens (L.) DC. var. utilis (Wall ex Wight) Baker ex Burck] on growth performance, feed utilization and body composition in Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus L.): Comparative nutritional evaluation of mucuna seeds. Aquaculture Research. 2003;34:487–500. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2109.2003.00836.x
  23. Chong ASC, Ishak SD, Osman Z, Hashim R. Effect of dietary protein level on the reproductive performance of female swordtails Xiphophorus helleri (Poeciliidae). Aquaculture. 2004;234:381–92. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2003.12.003
  24. Shaha A, Talukdar A, Das M. Effect of vitamin E supplemented fish feed on growth performance of the Gangetic Mystus (Mystus cavasius). Int. J. Fish. Aquat. Stud. 2022;10:85–91. Available from: https://doi.org/10.22271/fish.2022.v10.i4a.2709
  25. AOAC. Official methods of analysis. 18th ed. Gaithersburg, Maryland: Association of Officiating Analytical Chemists, Washington DC; 2005. Method 935.14 and 992.24. Available from: https://www.scirp.org/reference/ReferencesPapers?ReferenceID=2033299
  26. AOAC. Official Methods of Analysis of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists. 17th ed. Gaithersburg; 2003. Available from: https://www.scirp.org/reference/ReferencesPapers?ReferenceID=1994521
  27. Bligh EG, Dyer W. Total lipid Extraction and Purification. Can J Biochem Physiol. 1959;37:911–7. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1139/o59-099
  28. Farzana T, Mohajan S. Effect of incorporation of soy flour to wheat flour on nutritional and sensory quality of biscuits fortified with mushroom. Food Science & Nutrition. 2015;3:363–9. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.228
  29. Pike RL, Brown ML. Nutrition and Integrated Approach. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons; 1967. p. 197. Available from: https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=1036190
  30. Bhilave MP, Bhosale SV, Nadaf SB. Protein efficiency ratio (PER) of Ctenopharengedon idella fed on soyabean formulated feed. Biol Forum. 2012;4:79-81. Available from: https://www.researchtrend.net/bfij/biological_forum_4(1)_2012/15%20MP%20BHILAVE.pdf
  31. Tacon A, Albert GJ. Standard method for nutritional and feeding of farmed fish and shrimp. Argent librations press; 1990. Available from: https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=709760
  32. Bekcan S, Dogankaya L, Cakirogullari GC. Growth and Body Composition of European Catfish (Silurus glanis L.) Fed diets containing different percentages of protein. The Israeli Journal of Aquaculture – Bamidgeh. 2006;58(2):137–42. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.46989/001c.20430
  33. Hevroy EM, Espe M, Waagbo R, Sandnes K, Ruud M, Hemre GI. Nutrient utilization in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) fed increased levels of fish protein hydrolysate during a period of fast growth. Aquac Nutrition. 2005;11:301–13. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2095.2005.00357.x
  34. De Silva SS. Fish nutrition in Aquaculture. London; 1994. p. 320. Available from: https://books.google.co.in/books/about/Fish_Nutrition_in_Aquaculture.html?id=zCPvmeRx9mQC
  35. Stickeney RR, Hardy RW. Lipid Requirement of some warm water species. 1989;79:145–6. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/0044-8486(89)90455-9
  36. Parameshwaran S, Selvaraj C, Krishan R. The study of the biology of Labeo gonius in confined waters. Indian Journal of Fisheries. 1974;21:54–75.
  37. Khairuman, Amri K. Fish Farming Indigo Intensively (Fourth Printing). Jakarta South: PT Agromedia Pustaka; 2005.
  38. Santhosh B, Singh NP. Guidelines for water quality management for fish culture in Tripura. ICAR Research Complex for NEH Region, Tripura Center; 2007. Available from: https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=2092317
  39. Bhatnagar A, Sangwan P. Impact of Mass Bathing on Water Quality International journal of environment research. International journal of environment research. 2009;3:247–52. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/27794441_Impact_of_Mass_Bathing_on_Water_Quality
  40. Alikunhi KH. Fish culture in India. Fm. BuH. Indian Coun. Agn·. Res. 1957;20:144pp. Available from: https://eprints.cmfri.org.in/7724/
  41. Paul S. Comparison between carp polyculture system with silver carp (Hypopthalmichthys molitrix) and with small indigenous fish mola (Amblypharyngodon mola). 1998.
  42. Kohinoor AHM, Begum M, Hussain MG. Culture potentials of gulsha (Mystus cavasius) in monoculture management under different stocking densities. Bangladesh Journal of Fisheries Research. 2004:95–100. Available from: https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/33720985.pdf
  43. Garg SK, Bhatnagar A. Effect of fertilization frequency on pond productivity and fish biomass in still water ponds stocked with Cirrhinus mrigala (Ham.): Fertilization frequency in fish culture ponds. Aquaculture Research. 2000;31:409–14. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2109.2000.00422.x
  44. Kohinoor AHM. Development of culture technology of three small indigenous fish-mola (Amblypharyngodon mola), punti (Puntius sophore) and chela (Chela cachius) with notes on some aspects of their biology. 2000.
  45. DeLong DC, Halver JE, Mertz ET. Nutrition of salmonid fishes. Protein requirements of Chinook salmon at two water temperatures. Journal of Nutrition. 1958;65:589–99. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/65.4.589
  46. Ogino C, Saito K. The utilization of dietary protein in young carp. Bull. Jap. Soc. Sci. Fish. 1970;36:250–4.
  47. Rahman MAS, Gheyasuddin MA, Mazid M, Hossain MA. Formulation of quality fish feeds from indigenous raw materials for intensive culture of catfish (C. batrachus). Bangladesh Journal of Fisheries. 1:59–66.
  48. Sanaullah AASM, Mazid MA, Rahman MA, Gheysuddin S, Chakrabarty SC. Formulation of quality fish feed from indigenous raw materials and their effects on the growth of catfish Clarias batrachus, Bangladesh. Fish. 1986;9.
  49. Akter R, Ema NS, Hossain MS, Hossain Z. Effects of dietary polyunsaturated fatty acid on reproduction and developmental biology of Gangetic Mystus (Mystus cavasius) (Hamilton-Buchanan, 1822). Asian J Med Biol Res. 2021;6:641–9. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3329/ajmbr.v6i4.51230
  50. Khan MA, Jafri AK, Chadha NK. Effects of varying dietary protein levels on growth, reproductive performance, body and egg composition of rohu, Labeo rohita (Hamilton). Aquac Nutrition. 2005;11:11–7. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2095.2004.00318.x
  51. Luo H, Qin F, Li Y, Xiao C, Sun W, Liu F, et al. Positive effects of optimal dietary protein content on the growth, reproductive performance and health of Procambarus clarkii broodstock farming in rice field. Aquaculture Reports. 2025;40:102610. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aqrep.2024.102610

Advertisement

 

Help ?